Found Femdom: Artsy Stuff

axe · November 12, 2008 · Found Femdom · femdom, Found, Found Femdom · 13 Comments

I have no clue where this comes from or what it’s for.

When there’s something this good it’s best not to ask questions.

13 Comments

Robin November 12, 2008 at 10:44 pm

It is a beautiful picture – glad it is in black and white. Enjoy yourself Friday!

ThatToyChick November 13, 2008 at 1:02 am

Beautiful picture – it’s nice to see something in the genre outside of the usual whips-and-chains.

You’re very well spoken, just recently found this blog. Looking forward to meeting you on Friday.

Peridot November 13, 2008 at 6:00 pm

Once again axe shows us some long sexy legs, an ass crack, a contorted pose… a male with no visible face and body… “Femdom” indeed.

Alisa November 13, 2008 at 11:36 pm

Oooh, it almost looks like it would be a glass negative, except of course stay-ups mean post WWII. Nice vignetting though.

Cinder November 14, 2008 at 4:48 am

Perhaps “found malesubporn” would be a better tag? I agree with Peridot that these picture really don’t do much for Female Dominants. Sadly very little heterosexual material does, as it’s made for men. Gay malesubs are infinitely more sexily portrayed.

What I noticed? Well, first, the picture is an opposite of the CFNM kink – this is more NFCM. Second: She is standing in the grass on thin heels!!!! If I tried that the other heel would be buried to the hilt in the soil. And third: she has lost her skirt somewhere. I think that’s the thing that really annoyed Me. The rest: his pose, the curious dog, the light and the grainyness, the leg on his back pushing him down, all of that would be fine if it wasn’t so obvious that she had been undressed for his pleasure. As it is, that is the detail that ruins it for me.

E November 14, 2008 at 10:57 am

Walkthrough of my mental response:
– Ooo, pretty picture! Black and white is classy!
– Ooo, he’s wearing some sort of vest. I like that. And kneeling. Like some old-timey farmhand or something. I bet he can lift heavy things and has a muscular back.
– Mmm. Muscular backs.
– Pretty umbrella! Is she wearing a super long string of pearls?
– Why is she not wearing any bottoms? Outside? In the old timey field?
– Oh well. Cute shoes!
– …the dog is kinda menacing.

therambler November 15, 2008 at 4:18 am

while I agree with some that my first thought was to giggle at the heels and wonder if she had to be carried to the spot I do like the picture. The man does have a very well masculine look and well I used to own a piece of land that looked very much like that one 😀 It might be fun to invent reasons for her to be dressed like that lol

MaitresseS November 15, 2008 at 12:43 pm

That is a really beautiful picture!

Thursday's Child November 16, 2008 at 12:26 am

I’ve come across this image, as well. I’ve got it saved in my archives as being credited to Michael Podobycko…but I don’t know any more than that though…

maymay November 17, 2008 at 9:10 am

I think this is very sexy.

Ranat November 17, 2008 at 3:00 pm

I think vest-man is very sexy (and really, the more clothes a man is wearing just means more opportunities for me to rip them off). I don’t find heel-woman very appealing, but I can just imagine a barefoot woman wearing a comfortable skirt or trousers, and a scarf and nothing else in her place.

Xenaclone November 18, 2008 at 11:49 am

Have you seen the promos for ‘Bitch Slap’? The trailer’s as subtle as a brick [GGG] (plenty of slow motion, slightly wobbling, heaved up cleavage); but given that Michael ‘Iolaus’ Hurst, Kevin Sorbo and apparently Lucy Lawless are involved, it might also be a riot along with the eye candy.

http://www.bitchslapmovie.com/